Blog

As we prepare to celebrate the Fourth of July, which is really the Declaration of Independence Day, we should remember these three principles.

Whether NPV supporters like it or not, the national popular vote interstate compact is partisan. And it would create a powerful incentive for other partisan states to act in their perceived defense.

The National Popular Vote compact assumes courts could force non-member states to provide complete vote totals by the federal deadline, but in reality, slow or incomplete counts in those states could…

Supporters of National Popular Vote often overlook a major flaw: the compact relies on states that never joined it. If NPV ever took effect, that assumption could trigger a national election crisis.

A key defect of NPV is that it would be impossible to conduct a national recount. The fact that NPV lobbyists can’t provide accurate and honest responses to this issue raises even more red flags.

The year was 1787, and the Framers were hard at work in Philadelphia crafting our current Constitution to replace our first one—the Articles of Confederation.

The National Popular Vote interstate compact would create new—and completely legal—ways of manipulating the presidential election process. That’s not something anybody wants.

No major nation uses the National Popular Vote interstate compact’s election system—and for good reason.

A new article at Vox shows just how far supporters of the National Popular Vote interstate compact will go to avoid answering concerns about their plan’s technical defects.

NPV lobbyist authors piece filled with dubious claims. We take a deeper look.