Blog

A while back I wrote about New York’s unfortunate habit of failing to provide accurate vote counts for presidential electors, and how they managed to once again miss the mark in 2020. Here’s a brief …

In the first post of this two-part series, I explained how an NPV lobbyist admitted that their plan would allow state chief election officers (CEOs) to make up vote totals in the event that a state w…

According to a former president of the American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut, National Popular Vote “has a serious flaw that would likely undermine not only coalitions but the very legitimacy…

Fortunately, House Joint Resolution 14 has little chance of passing.

For at least the fourth consecutive presidential election cycle, the numbers submitted by New York on its Certificate of Ascertainment were off.

The fundamental flaw of the NPV compact is that it relies on the cooperation of non-member states, including those that strongly oppose NPV, to operate successfully.

If legislators are really concerned about their state winner-take-all law, there are other alternatives.

The bottom line is that NPV is a major threat to the Constitution and the integrity of presidential elections.