Blog

If legislators are really concerned about their state winner-take-all law, there are other alternatives.

The bottom line is that NPV is a major threat to the Constitution and the integrity of presidential elections.

Opponents of the Electoral College often claim a national popular vote would result in higher turnout. Here we debunk the myth that a national popular vote would make every state a “battleground.”

NPV advocates claims of simplicity break like waves upon the rocks of reality.

Those who believe NPV will produce a consequential increase in voter turnout should consider the evidence, which suggests that there are other much more effective changes waiting to be championed tha…

One flaw of NPV is especially obvious this year, as the census results in the reapportionment of congressional seats among the states.

NPV’s Utah “organizer,” Bunnie Keen, claims that the NPV change is minor and simple, but also that it would transform the way presidential politics works. Which is it?

The Constitution sets up a framework for presidential elections—the state-by-state process now known as the Electoral College—but leaves the details to state legislatures and to Congress.

The day the Electoral College votes is a vital part of our Constitutional process predicated on a robust system of checks and balances.

We walk through a few of the most common questions and misunderstandings about the Electoral College.